The ABC of Gender Mainstreaming in a Project
Gender mainstreaming in projects is a concept that takes into account how certain conditions and situations affect women and men differently. The concept of gender mainstreaming was first introduced at the 1985 Nairobi World Conference on Women. In the 1995 Fourth United Nations World Conference on Women in Beijing, the Beijing Platform for Action was developed and gender mainstreaming was adopted bothB as a tool towards achieving gender equality.
DEFINITION: Gender mainstreaming means integrating a gender equality perspective at all stages and levels of policies, programmes and projects. The conditions and needs of men and women differ from communities, ethnic groups, religion, age and so many other factors. These conditions include unequal access to and control over power, resources, human rights and institutions, including the justice system.
It should be noted that counting the number of women and men that participate in a program does not entirely mean that that gender has been mainstreamed
WHY GENDER MAINSTREAMING?
It enables you to effectively take into consideration the differences between men and women when designing, implementing and evaluating policies, programmes and projects, so that they benefit both women and men and do not increase inequality but enhance gender equality.
Gender mainstreaming aims to solve –sometimes hidden- gender inequalities. It is therefore a tool for achieving gender equality.
Five Principles of Gender Mainstreaming
Gender-sensitive language
Texts referring to or addressing both women and men must make women and men equally visible. E.g instead of manpower, say human resource. This applies to, amongst others, forms, documents, telephone directories, texts on the intranet and the internet, advertising for events, folders, posters and films.
Attention must also be paid to a gender-sensitive choice of images when preparing public relations material.
Gender-specific data collection and analysis
Data must be collected, analysed and presented by gender. Social dimensions, such as age, ethnicity, income and level of education should also be reflected where possible.
Gender-specific analysis of the initial situation must provide the basis for all decisions.
Equal access to and utilisation of services
Services and products must be assessed as to their different effects on women and men. It is important to identify:
Who uses the services (women or men or both)?
Who are the clients (women or men or both)?
Who are the target groups?
Do women and men have different needs?
Are the different circumstances of women and men taken into account when planning and designing services?
Have all target groups access to the same sources of information?
Who benefits most?
Which group would suffer most if they could not use the services offered?
Are the offices providing the service structurally gendered and barrier free, (i.e. the waiting areas, lighting, access without steps, signage)?
Women and men are equally involved in decision making
There are binding targets for a balanced gender ratio at all levels of decision making.
Measures and strategies geared towards a balanced gender ratio must be taken at all levels of decision making.
This is also important when appointing working groups, project teams, commissions and advisory boards, as well as when organising events, e.g. when selecting speakers.
Workplaces must be structurally gendered and barrier free where possible (e.g. gendered signage, sufficient lighting, avoiding potentially frightening situations as in poorly accessible basement archives, access without steps, social rooms for different occupations).
Equal treatment is integrated into steering processes
Steering instruments include quality management and gender budgeting, amongst others. It is important to note that:
Paying attention to the different circumstances of women and men enhances
the success rate,
effectiveness and
maximum utilisation of staff and funds.
All targets related to people are defined in terms of full equality and the targets attained are therefore presented by gender.
Controlling routine as a matter of course includes gender-specific evaluation of results and a systematic steering of the gender ratio, in other words, the development and implementation of (new and adapted) targets, strategies and measure
KEY QUESTIONS TO ASK WHEN MAINSTREAMING GENDER IN THE PROJECT CYCLE
PLANNING PHASE
Does the necessary gender disaggregated data exist?
Is the information regarding the target group of a program and their current condition broken down according to gender?
Has due considerations been given to problems that are gender related? (Security and safety, health-related issues)
Has due consideration been given to the practical needs of both women and men?
Will the women and men who are targeted for the program enjoy benefits of the program equally?
Has due considerations been given to the indirect positive or negative impact of a program on women and men?
Has the various roles of women and men in society been taken into consideration? (government, local community, home, school and private sector).
Have the women and men targeted for the program been consulted, and their views heard?
Is there equal representation? Be mindful where equity is needed to be applied.
IMPLEMENTING PHASE
Is the program equally accessible and open to participation of women and men? (provision of information, time of access, other conditions that could restrict access such as care work)
When it is necessary to take into due consideration problems that are gender related (safety, health), has the gender of the person responsible for implementing the program been taken into consideration?
Are women and men equally represented in the decision-making process and implementation of program.
POST IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
Does the data exist and is it disaggregated according to gender?
Has the program satisfied the needs of both women and men?
What is the actual utilization and level of participation in the program?
Are both women and men satisfied with the program?
Have both women and men in the target group equally received benefits of the program?
Were both women and men satisfied with the way they participated in the planning and implementation processes of the program?
What changed through the participation of both women and men in the program planning to implementation phases?
Were there any indirect positive or negative impacts of the program on women and men?
Did the program widen or narrow the existing social and economic gap between women and men?
How did the program change the role of women and men in the society? (government, local community, family, schools, companies/enterprises)
How did the program impact other areas, or society and economy as a whole?
Council of Europe, 2022, https://www.coe.int/en/web/genderequality/what-is-gender-mainstreaming
City of Vienna, Stadt Wien, https://www.wien.gv.at/english/administration/gendermainstreaming/principles/five-principles.html
THANKS FOR SHARING . VERY EDUCATIVE. FROM RATEI